\
 
To listen, click on the Play (>) button below.  Transcript of blog follows.
Latest government statistics for Delinquent Collection Activities show the IRS rejects more than three of every four Offers in Compromise.  The IRS accepted only 11,000 of 52,000 of Offers in Compromise submitted in 2009.  Even though the government is strapped for funds, the IRS accepted a mere 21 percent of people trying to get back into the system.

To get the IRS to agree to an Offer in Compromise, the taxpayer must offer an amount that “reasonably reflects collection potential.” (IRM 5.8.1.1.3).  Translated that means an Offer in Compromise must contain the minimum amount of the taxpayer’s equity in his or her assets plus an amount based upon “Future Income.”

“Future Income” is one of the trouble spots where many Offers fail.  The “Future Income” calculation creates an “asset” based upon the taxpayer’s ability to make monthly payments after necessary living expenses are deducted.  Extra monthly income, that is “extra” as defined by the IRS, is multiplied by either 48 or 60 months, depending on Offer payment terms. 

Assume for a moment that a contractor has no real assets, but after necessary living expenses are deducted has $400 extra each month.  The minimum Offer amount could be as high as $24,000.  Based upon regulations, the IRS takes the $400 and multiplies by as much as 60 months.  What seemed like a promising situation now seems doomed.

Here’s where tax law becomes magic.  With detailed knowledge of the Internal Revenue Manual regulations on Offers in Compromise, a dogged attitude to fix tax problems, and a questioning mind, a tax attorney can make the $24,000 Future Income asset disappear.

Let’s assume that the contractor hauls a lot of material and refuse each month for work.  Were he to hire a hauler, the contractor would incur costs of $400 monthly.  Right now, as we draft our Offer, the contractor uses his twelve year-old pickup to haul, a beat up truck worth about a $1,000.

By selling the pickup truck and offering the $1,000 for the Offer, the contractor can claim the expected costs of delivery as a business expense.  (See IRM 5.8.5.5.1).  With the contractor expected to have higher monthly hauling costs of $400, he no longer has any Future Income.  Our minimum Offer amount has now plummeted by $23,000 to $1,000.

Now you see it; now you don’t.  Of course, one problem remains – how will the contractor haul his materials and refuse? There are some secrets a magician can never reveal.
 


Comments


Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply

Picture
Murray Singerman, JD, LLM

Author

Self-dubbed "Tax Knight," Murray Singerman writes in defense of the "humble citizen," often beaten down by the IRS and state taxing authorities.  Enjoy his short ruminations about the ever-changing area of tax controversy law.  Written with accountants in mind, Murray offers useful info and a chuckle to make your day a bit more enjoyable.

Archives

July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010

Categories

All
1099s
Accountant
Audits
Bankruptcy
Comptroller
Delinquent Taxes
Discharge
Driver
Employees
Examinations
Identity Theft
Independent Contractors
Installment Agreements
Irs
Lawyers
Magic
Malpractice
Misclassification
Offer In Compromise
Refund
State Taxes
Tax Attorney
Tax Resolution Companies
Taxpayer Advocate

RSS Feed